Legal Opinion
Goldinger v. Datex-Ohmeda Cash Balance Plan
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 31, 2010No. Case C07-2081RAJPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court for the resolution of a legal issue that Plaintiffs first raised in their trial brief, and has now been the subject of supplemental briefing and oral argument. The court’s resolution today means that there is no need for a trial at this time. Trial may be necessary later, however, because this order leaves two questions unresolved: was the ERISA plan at issue partially terminated, and, if so, what are Plaintiffs’ and other class members’ damages. The court sets a trial date of September 20, 2010. This…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Martin Hansen, Cross-Appellee v. The Continental Insurance Company and Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Mary Anne Bendixen v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Neil Bergt v. The Retirement Plan for Pilots Employed by Markair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Toohey v. Wyndham Worldwide Corp. Health & Welfare PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Toohey v. WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORP. HEALTH & WELFAREDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010