Legal Opinion

Furber v. Page

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1892PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Mueeay F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shope

Counsel for appellant disavow an intention to insist upon a reversal of the decree upon the ground that the court below erred in not decreeing the specific performance of a parol contract, merely, for the conveyance of the land in controversy. They say: “Counsél (for appellee) begin their brief by begging the whole question. They state that this bill is filed to enforce an oral contract. * * * We must, of course, agree with them that a court of chancery has no power to enforce the claims of Furber, however equitable they may be, if based wholly upon a verbal agreement.” With the law thus…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Chaffraix v. John B. Lafitte & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  3. Niehoff v. DudleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Smith v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Kelly v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. All v. PrillamanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. Kochorimbus v. MaggosIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Bride v. StormerIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Brooks v. GretzIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API