Legal Opinion

Moore v. Lehigh Valley R.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 18, 1946PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAFFEY, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant railroad company. There are three matters for discussion. These will be taken up in turn.

I

First, the railroad company moves to vacate plaintiff’s notice of taking a deposition before trial. This is on the ground that “there is no proper designation or description of the person sought to be examined.” The notice recited that plaintiff would take the deposition of defendant by its officer or managing agent having knowledge of the ownership, operation, control, charter agreements and location of the barge ‘No. 8’ on February 16, 1944” [the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  2. Spaeth v. WarNer Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  3. Orange County Theatres, Inc. v. LevyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  4. Boiczuk v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  5. Freeman v. Hotel Waldorf-Astoria CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morrison Export Co. v. GoldstoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  2. Mattingly v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API