Legal Opinion

People v. Tribble

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 30, 2016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Judgment of conviction, rendered September 28, 2012, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

In view of defendant’s knowing waiver of her right to prosecution by information, the facial sufficiency of the accusatory instrument must be assessed under the standard required of a misdemeanor complaint {see People v Dumay, 23 NY3d 518 [2014]). Even when viewed under the more liberal standard, the accusatory instrument was jurisdictionally defective since it failed to allege “facts of an evidentiary character” (CPL 100.15 [3])…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. DumayNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. BelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People v. EduardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API