Legal Opinion

Comi v. M M Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 4, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This appeal is from a final decree in equity holding valid a tax deed.

The only question is one of law, whether the prop- ’ erty is sufficiently described. The description is:

“NW% of SWVi, less E% — SE%—NW%—SW% in Section 35, Township 52 South, Range 41 East, in the County of Dade, State of Florida.”

It has been held by this Court:

“Greater Strictness is required of the description of the land contained in a tax deed than in voluntary deeds.” Jarrell v. McRainey, 65 Fla. 149, 61 Sou. 241.

“It is well settled in this jurisdiction that the description of property in a tax deed must be certain in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newsom v. Belle Mead Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Sumner Lumber Co. v. DeenSupreme Court of Florida · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Baker v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API