Legal Opinion

Newsom v. Belle Mead Development Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 14, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

In an ejectment suit the plaintiff claimed title and right of possession to the lands under a deed and mesne conveyances established by stipulation.

The defendant claimed .under a tax deed.

The plaintiff described the land as: “A certain tract or parcel of land, situated, lying and being in Volusia County, State of Florida, known and described as follows, to-wit: Lot two (2) Block Six (6), Mason Ik Carswell’s Subdivision of Holly Hill of the Fleming Purchase of the Thomas Fitch Grant, according to map in Map Book 2, page 90, of record in Public Records in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Power v. BowdleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Tax Securities Corp. v. BorlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Jarrell v. McRaineySupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  4. Dixon Et Ux. v. City of CocoaSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Miller v. LindstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1903

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Kester v. BostwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  3. Moore v. Wesley E. Garrison, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Comi v. M M CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  5. Schouten, Et Ux. v. HuntSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API