Legal Opinion

Sumner Lumber Co. v. Deen

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 11, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Marion County.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

This action was begun by attachment issued and levied under the statute. The following is the substances of the affidavit on which the attachment was issued:

“Before the subscriber, a notary public, personally came T. E. Williams, who being duly sworn, says: That he is the president of Sumner Lumber Company, the above named plaintiff; that the defendants, George W. Deen and J. M. Bell, as copartners under the style and firm name of Deen & Bell ,are indebted to the Sumner Lumber Company in the sum of $9,984.00; that the same is an actual and existing debt or demand; and that the defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Tanner & Delaney Engine Co. v. Hall & MobleySupreme Court of Florida · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Comi v. M M CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API