Legal Opinion
Pitman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 12, 1933No. 745PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. Petitioner is a full-blood member of the Creek Tribe of Indians,, enrolled opposite No. 1833*. She was married to “Robert L. Pitman, Sr., a white man. There was born of this marriage a son, Robert Pitman, Jr. He was duly enrolled as a half-blood member of the Creek Nation. Petitioner was divorced from Pitman, Sr., in 1911. Pitman, Jr., was allotted 38.79 acres of land as a homestead, and 121.40 acres of land as a surplus allotment’. Allotment deeds were duly executed and delivered therefor.
On October 14,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Murphy Oil Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ennis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Goodrich v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Joseph Daney and Bertha DaneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Holt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
- Glenn v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Folk v. MonsellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Albion-Idaho Land Co. v. Naf Irr. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.