Tucson Medical Center v. Heckler
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
I
For cost reporting years before October 1, 1983, Medicare 1 applied its “cost reimbursement system” to repay hospitals that had furnished inpatient services to Medicare patients. Under this system, Medi care determined the “reasonable cost” of the inpatient services that a hospital had provided to patients, and then reimbursed the hospitals in that amount or in the amount of the hospital’s customary charges, whichever was less. 42 U.S.C. § 1395f(b). At the close of a fiscal year, a hospital would submit a cost report to its “fiscal intermediary,” usually…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- HECKLER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. LOPEZ Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- 4 soc.sec.rep.ser. 80, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 15,133 Mario Lopez v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Lopez v. HecklerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Washington Hospital Center v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Samaritan Health Center v. HecklerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Georgetown University Hospital v. BowenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Greenville Hospital System v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
- Ozark Mountain Regional Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services, Provider Reimbursement Review BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.