Samaritan Health Center v. Heckler
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
By agreement of the parties, this matter has been submitted on the merits. For reasons set forth in a Memorandum to be filed, an accompanying order will declare that the Court has jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ complaint, that the plaintiff hospitals have standing to sue, and that the Secretary also has a clear, nondiscretionary duty to develop and publish a definition of “disproportionate share” hospitals * and to identify those hospitals to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jewish Hospital, Inc. v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- In Re Medicare Reimbursement LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Deaconess Health Services Corp. v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Cabell Huntington Hospital, Inc. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.