Johnson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
The lengthy and burdensome record in the above case is revisited and reviewed. The Court of Criminal Appeals in an unpublished Per Curiam opinion on the Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review recited in substance that the Appellant had argued that the trial court fell into error in instructing the jury on the law concerning good time and parole, inasmuch as that charge was predicated upon an unconstitutional statute. Our Court of Appeals rejected this challenge of unconstitutionality of TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 37.-07, sec. 4 (Vernon Supp.1989).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Evans v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989
- Shorten v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1989
- Dennis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.