City of New Albany v. Endres
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Ployd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
The appellee sued the appellants to enjoin them from widening a certain street in said city, which, it is alleged, the appellants, the city and its marshal, were threatening and about to do by extending the same over appellee’s lot. The issues formed were submitted to and tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a special finding of the facts, on which the court stated conclusions of law favorable to the appellee, upon which he had judgment perpetually enjoining appellants, as prayed for in the complaint.
The errors assigned here, among other things, call in question the conclusions of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Boulden v. McIntireIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Dodge v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Kerfoot v. KessenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Compton v. BenhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Chicago & South Eastern Railway Co. v. GloverIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Daley v. IselinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.