Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Bruce

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1985No. 71645, (Calendar No. 16)PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This case requires us to decide if records requested by the Michigan Board of Medicine, and ordered by investigative subpoena to be produced, are privileged or confidential with respect to an investigation by the board, although the documents are not public records nor subject to court subpoena for any other purposes.

The Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of the Ingham Circuit Court, holding that defendant hospital’s peer review committee proceedings were confidential and could not be subpoenaed by the Board of Medicine. 124 Mich App 796; 335 NW2d 697 (1983).

We affirm.

Introduction

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Grand Ledge Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Unnamed Physician v. Commission on Medical DisciplineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Reed v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Marchand v. Henry Ford HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Monty v. Warren Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dorris v. Detroit Osteopathic Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Feyz v. Mercy Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Gallagher v. Detroit-Macomb Hospital Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Manzo v. Petrella & Petrella & Associates, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Krusac v. Covenant Medical Center, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API