Legal Opinion

State v. Ortiz

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 2009No. 35278PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Chief Judge.

Hunverto Pasquinal Ortiz, was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance following a jury trial. On appeal, Ortiz argues the trial court erred by allowing the State to introduce certain testimony and that his right to a fair trial was violated by prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument. Finding no error, we affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

Ortiz was stopped for speeding. During the traffic stop, another officer arrived with a narcotics canine, and the dog alerted on the front passenger side of Ortiz’s vehicle. The officers then searched the vehicle and noticed a white…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. RaudebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. EnnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PullinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. TankovichIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. Martin C. CardozaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. Christopher Gibb LandellIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. David M. KnottIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API