Legal Opinion

State v. Tankovich

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 2013No. 38813PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Frank James Tankovich appeals from his convictions for malicious harassment and conspiracy to commit malicious harassment. He asserts that the court erred by denying his motion to sever his trial from that of his co-defendant, that the court erred in admitting evidence, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the guilty verdict.

I

BACKGROUND

On the afternoon of August 16, 2009, Frank Tankovich and his brothers, William and Ira Tankovich (hereinafter referred to as Tankovich, William, and Ira, respectively) drove past the home of Kenneth Requena, a man of Puerto Rican…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. SheahanIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Robert Javier Garcia, Jr.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. Angela Marie BoehmIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. Kathryn Laura BlakeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. HindsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2021
  5. State v. BarkerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API