Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1908No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Sanilac; Beach, J. Bill of interpleader by the State Bank of Croswell against Samuel Johnson, administrator of the estate of Thomas Parker, deceased, and Alice Parker, to determine the title to a certificate of deposit. From a decree for defendant Johnson, defendant Parker appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The complainant bank filed a bill of inter-pleader for the purpose of determining the ownership of a fund which it had on deposit, which was claimed by the defendant Johnson, as administrator of the estate of Thomas Parker, deceased, as belonging to his estate, and by the defendant Alice Parker, widow of Thomas Parker, by virtue of the transfer to her, by indorsement, of the following.certificate of deposit, on the 11th day of December, 1906, viz.:

“State Bank oe Croswell. No. 17820. $1800.00.
“Croswell, Mich., July 3, 1906.
“Thomas Parker has deposited in this bank eighteen hundred dollars,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whalen v. MilhollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. In Re the Final Accounting of Executors of AlbrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Love v. FrancisMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ellis v. SecorMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Driscoll v. DriscollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Shepard v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. In re BerryDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1917
  3. Negaunee National Bank v. Le BeauMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Holman v. Deseret Savings BankUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Union Trust & Savings Bank v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API