In re Allen
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Dissent
Dooley, J.,
¶ 28. dissenting. This is a summary judgment proceeding, but the PCR court did not treat it as such. In particular, in deciding the prejudice question as a matter of law, the court ignored perhaps the most fundamental principle of the summary judgment standard: that the trial court must view the facts most favorably to the nonmoving party and afford that party — in this case petitioner — the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences. Here, the PCR court did exactly the opposite by viewing the facts favorably to the State and resolving all inferences and reasonable doubts in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Warrior Tombigbee Transportation Company, Inc. v. M/v Nan Fung Etc., John K. Irish, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.