Prauss v. Adamski
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTooze, J.
This is an action to recover damages for the death of Eose Kudrna, plaintiff’s intestate, resulting from the alleged negligent operation of a motor vehicle by defendant Laudie Adamski. The case was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff’s brief sets forth 18 assignments of error. Nine of the assignments are directed to the failure and refusal of the trial court to give certain instructions to the jury as requested by plaintiff; five relate to instructions given; three, to evidentiary matters; and the last, to the refusal of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hansen v. HayesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Shaker v. ShakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Weinstein v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Kudrna v. AdamskiOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- SPENCE, ADM'X v. RasmussenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Wilson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State of Oregon v. WojahnOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Ingram v. Acands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Falls v. MortensenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.