Legal Opinion
State v. Daniel
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Thomas Aduak Daniel appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence, raising issues involving voir dire and jury selection. Because the record reveals no prejudice to Daniel, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] On July 4, 1998, 19-year-old Chris Dyer worked the night shift at the Sioux Falls post office, taking a break from his work at 3:00 a.m. During his break he sat in his car, parked in a nearby grocery store parking lot, and waited for a friend who was to meet him and pick up some belongings left earlier with Dyer. Around 3:15 a.m., 28-year-old Daniel approached the car and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. MacKeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Rousseau v. West Coast House MoversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- State v. Blue ThunderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HansenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State of West Virginia v. Timothy Ray SutherlandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. VerhoefSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. MoranSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HayesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Fool BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.