Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Hynes

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1985No. 84-262PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fahrnbruch.D.J.

Plaintiffs, Harold W. and D. Lucille Peterson, as assignees, brought a law action to recover amounts claimed due under a consulting services agreement entered into in connection with the sale of a bank holding company. After a bench trial the court granted plaintiffs judgment for $36,000 together with prejudgment interest against three of the defendants who are appellants here. Other defendants were dismissed from the action. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

There is no dispute that as of January 17, 1978, plaintiffs’ assignors, Larry G. Boesen and Randel K. Boesen,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pike v. TriskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Olds v. JamisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Schlueter v. School District No. 42 of Madison CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Land Paving Co. v. D. A. Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bando v. ColeNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fisbeck v. Scherbarth, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Burnison v. JohnstonNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Aurora Technology v. LabedzNebraska Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Lee Sapp Leasing, Inc. v. Catholic Archbishop of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Lee Sapp Leasing, Inc. v. Catholic Archbishop of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API