Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee Sapp Leasing, Inc. v. Catholic Archbishop of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1995No. S-93-781Published

1DissentConnolly, J.

Gross High’s duties to perform under the lease agreement were not dependent upon its acknowledgment of delivery of the surge suppressors.

The majority finds that the acceptance and delivery letter was part of the agreement between LSL and Gross High, because it constituted an addendum to the lease. However, there are several problems with considering the acceptance and delivery letter as an addendum. First, the majority states that the acceptance and delivery letter was attached to the lease and delivered at the same time. While the record indicates that the acceptance and delivery letter was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker's Supermarkets, Inc. v. FeldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ashland State Bank v. Elkhorn Racquetball, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Gerdes v. Omaha Home for BoysNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Peterson v. HynesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API