Mathews v. Hedlund
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Lincoln Frost, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Root, C.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court for Lancaster county affirming the action of the state board of *827health in revoking defendant’s license to practice medicine, surgery and obstetrics in Nebraska.
1. The state board of health has filed a motion to dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction of the court to review said order in error proceedings. The argument of counsel, although forceful and learned, urges no better reasons in favor of his client’s contention than were presented in Munk v. Frink, 75 Neb. 172, wherein the identical point was considered and decided against said…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- State ex rel. Hart v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Eastman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- People Ex Rel. Kasschau v. Board of Police CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Moran v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Roy v. BLADEN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. R-31Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Hanson v. Michigan State Board of Registration in MedicineMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Kram v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Ridenour v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.