Heirs of Adams v. Adams
Supreme Court of Vermont
Appeal from the court of chancery. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion delivered by the court,
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Redfield, J.
This is a bill in chancery, wherein the plaintiffs in substance allege, that they are heirs at law of Friend Adams, late *53of Panton, deceased, intestate, and bring this bill for the benefit of all the heirs, or so many as may choose to eome in under the claims set forth in the bill.
The bill states, — 1. That Friend Adams deceased, intestate, on the nineteenth day of April, 1839, leaving no widow, but leaving the plaintiffs and defendants and some others, his children, and the representatives of such as have deceased; — 2. That he had a large…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sparhawk v. Administrator of Ozias BuellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837
- Morse v. SlasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1841
- Newell v. NewellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1841
- Walsh v. PierceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
3Cited by42 opinions
- Chipman v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Creek v. LaskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Scott v. RoystonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Dower v. SeedsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
- Dunnett v. Shields and ConantSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.