Legal Opinion

Boekeloo v. Board of Review of City of Clinton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 29, 1995No. 93-1683PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

This case presents the interesting and difficult issue of what effect environmental contamination has on the tax valuation of property. Property owned by Robert J. Boekeloo and Vicki J. Boekeloo, appellants, has groundwater contamination. The Clinton city assessor did not consider the existence of this contamination when he valued the Boekeloos’ property. The appellees, Board of Review of the City of Clinton and its members, affirmed the tax valuation, as did the district court.

Although we believe the assessor should have considered the effect of the contamination on the value…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Inmar Associates, Inc. v. Borough of CarlstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Bartlett & Co. Grain v. BOARD OF REVIEW, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Westling v. County of Mille LacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Heritage Cablevision v. Board of Review of the Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Post-Newsweek Cable, Inc. v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Weinhold v. WolffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Soifer v. Floyd County Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. Wellmark, Inc. v. Polk County Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. Compiano v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF POLK COUNTYSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. Aladdin, Inc. v. Black Hawk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API