Legal Opinion
Richmond v. White Mountain Recreation Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 4, 1996No. 94-693PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
White Mountain Recreation Association, Inc., d/b/a White Mountain Attractions Association (White Mountain), and White Mountains 93 Association, a/k/a Ski 93 (Ski 93), engaged Fadden Construction Company (Fadden) to build an addition onto a visitors’ center. Charles W. Richmond, a Fadden employee, fell off a ladder while working on the building project. Richmond sued White Mountain and Ski 93 under several theories of liability, including violation of RSA 277:2 (1987), negligent selection of Fadden as a contractor, and failure to protect against a danger inherent in the work. Cf. RSA 281-A:8…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Valdez v. Cillessen & Son, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Mentzer v. OgnibeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Collectramatic, Inc. v. Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Ray v. SchneiderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Gilmore v. Bradgate Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ComeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Cote v. NH CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
- Stephen Harriman, Plaintiff v. Patti Kemen, Individually and on behalf of REMAX Legacy; Patti Kemen Enterprises, LLC; Vendor Resource Management, Inc.; and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (a/k/a Freddie Mac), DefendantsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
- Suburban v. TriancoDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
- Webber v. DeckDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020