Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. Bradgate Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided February 24, 1992No. 90-344PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Devine, C.J.) has certified the following question of law for our consideration under Supreme Court Rule 34; “Does RSA 358-A:3 I preclude a Consumer Protection Act claim against a condominium seller and developer?” We answer in the negative.
The relevant facts are as follows. In January 1987, the plaintiffs contracted to purchase a cape-style condominium located in Laconia *236from the seller and developer, Colonial Hills Corporation (Colonial Hills), a subsidiary of Bradgate Associates, Inc. (Bradgate Associates). Defendant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Attorney General v. Diamond Mortgage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Town of Wolfeboro v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Chase v. DoraisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Rousseau v. EshlemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Finlay Commercial Real Estate, Inc. v. PainoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Roberts v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. Minebea Co., Ltd.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Patch v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- Snow v. American Morgan Horse Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Nault's Automobile Sales, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.