United States v. Hart
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Dissent
EFFRON, Chief Judge,
with whom STUCKY, Judge, joins (dissenting):
The Air Force discharged Appellant and did not have authority to revoke his discharge. The eases cited by the majority are informative regarding the factors that may be considered in evaluating jurisdictional issues, but those cases do not resolve the question presented today regarding the relationship between court-martial jurisdiction and the personnel management provisions of 10 U.S.C. § 1168 (2000). Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from the conclusion of the majority opinion that the court-martial had personal jurisdiction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. HowardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. ClardyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HarmonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. MelansonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.