Legal Opinion
Kilgust Heating Division of Wolff, Kubly & Hirsig, Inc. v. Kemp
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1975No. 37 (1974)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The principal issue raised on this appeal is whether or not there was sufficient evidence that materials furnished by the lienholder were incorporated into or used on the defendants’ premises so as to give rise to a lienable claim. Other questions concern the prejudgment interest allowed by the trial court.
We conclude that there was a lienable claim and that the judgment of foreclosure should be affirmed, but that the rate of interest allowed should be modified.
The Kilgust Heating Division of Wolff, Kubly & Hirsig, Inc., plaintiff-respondent (“Kilgust”), contracted with O. T. Havey, d/b/a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Valiga v. National Food Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Slam v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Thiel v. DamrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Builder's Lumber Co. v. StuartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Afram Export Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation v. Metallurgiki Halyps, S.A., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Estreen v. BluhmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Jack Ma, a Subject of the Republic of China v. The Community Bank, a Wisconsin Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.