Legal Opinion

Pond v. Leslein

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1995No. 1993-2584PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 50.] POND, APPELLANT v. LESLEIN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Pond v. Leslein,

1995-Ohio-193.] Civil procedure—Civ.R. 50—Motion for directed verdict—Trial court errs in denying plaintiff's motions for a directed verdict and allowing the jury to decide the issue of defendant's negligence, when. (No. 93-2584—Submitted February 21, 1995—Decided April 19, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93AP-617. __________________ {¶ 1} While driving his car on the afternoon of April 20, 1989, defendant- appellee…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ziegler v. Wendel Poultry Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Skinner v. Pennsylvania Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Pond v. LesleinOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Tomlinson v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arndt v. P M Ltd., 2007-P-0038 (5-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Kerns v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Wall v. Sprague, Ca2007-05-065 (7-7-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Kerns v. HaleOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Summers v. Max Erma's Restaurant, 2008-T-0001 (8-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API