Smith v. Smith
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Elliott & Elliott, Theodore Elliott, and J. B. Webster, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an action to quiet title, and the material facts, very generally and briefly stated, are: Mary E. Smith, wife of plaintiff, brought suit for divorce against him. She obtained a decree granting the divorce, and two thirds of the community property, which consisted of a homestead. She also obtained an order for alimony, to enforce which an execution was issued, and after the decree was entered, was levied upon the interest of plaintiff in what had been, prior to the decree, the homestead. A sale was had under the execution, and defendant Elliott became the purchaser and has obtained a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Harris v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Felch v. BeaudryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Woodbury v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Montgomery v. HarringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mercer Casualty Co. v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Hartke v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Robinson v. El Centro Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Chambers v. FarnhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Contra Costa Water Co. v. City of OaklandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.