Woodbury v. Bowman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Fifth District. For case see opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtTerry, C. J.
Baldwin, J. concurring.
This was an action upon an injunction bond; plaintiff recovered judgment below, and defendants appeal.
The first point taken by Appellant is, that the Court below rejected evidence offered by defendants to prove that the right to the injunction was not finally decided at the commencement of this action. This point would be decisive of the case, if the evidence offered was sufficient to establish the pendency of the injunction at the time this suit was instituted; but upon examining the evidence offered, it is clear that it is not sufficient for this purpose.
The paper…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Sharon v. TerryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1888
- Harris v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Murray v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Sharon v. HillUnited States Circuit Court · 1885
- Di Nola v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.