Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided May 26, 1989No. 05-87-01289-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAGARDE, Justice.
Randy Kim Smith appeals his conviction for obstructing an entrance to a place of business to which the public had access. TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 42.03 (Vernon 1974). Punishment was assessed at five days’ confinement and a $500 fine. In eight points of error, appellant claims that section 42.03 of the Texas Penal Code is unconstitutional and that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. We overrule all eight points of error and affirm the conviction.
Because several of appellant’s points of error require a detailed analysis of the statement of facts, we set forth…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Bader v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Sullivan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Bustillos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.