Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

MacHado v. Bal

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1930No. 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OE THE COURT BY

PARSONS, J.

This case is before us upon submission on agreed facts brought within the provisions of section 2371, R. L. 1925. From the agreed statement the following facts among others appear: The plaintiff, C. B. Machado, is and was at all times mentioned in the statement, except during the period of suspension referred to therein, a duly commissioned and acting police officer of the County of Maui. Eugene Bal . is the duly elected and qualified and acting auditor of the County of Maui. On May 18, 1927, a warrant for the ar rest of Felipe Drapesa issued out of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Chapman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. State ex rel. Crow v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Hotchkiss v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  4. City of Moorhead v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Schieffelin v. HenryNew York Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hart v. County of SagadahocSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  2. Maui County Council v. ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re SaludesHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1998
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API