Francis H. Fisher, Inc. v. Midwesco Enterprise, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon motion for summary judgment by defendants Midwesco Enterprise, Inc. and Mid-Atlantic Pipe Corporation pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The facts that gave rise to this dispute are as follows: In August, 1973, plaintiff Fisher, Inc. learned that Wright-Patterson Air Force Base at Dayton, Ohio intended to invite bids on the installation of certain underground high temperature hot water lines. Fisher submitted a bid on this project. Prior to such submission Fisher obtained a quotation for supplying…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James E. Duncan v. Mr. & Mrs. Harold Peck, Highlands Coal & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Shafer v. Wintrow (In Re Wintrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- City of Canton v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- City Of Canton, Ohio v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.