Legal Opinion

State Bank, Palmer v. Scoular-Bishop Grain Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1984No. 83-034PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colwell, D.J., Retired.

Plaintiff, State Bank, Palmer, Nebraska (Bank), brought this conversion suit against defendant, Scoular-Bishop Grain Co. (Scoular-Bishop), for grain which Scoular-Bishop bought that was subject to a recorded security interest in favor of the Bank. The security agreement required written permission to sell, which was not obtained. Scoular-Bishop claimed that the Bank had knowledge of the sales and that a course of dealing between the parties implied consent, waiver, ratification, and estoppel. At the close of the evidence a $28,941 verdict was directed for plaintiff.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lincoln Grain, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Garden City Production Credit Assn. v. LannanNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Castellano v. BitkowerNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Central California Equipment Co. v. Dolk Tractor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Farmers State Bank v. Edison Non-Stock Cooperative Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. Farmland Foods, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Five Points Bank v. Scoular-Bishop Grain Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Battle Creek State Bank v. HaakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. City Bank & Trust Co. v. Van AndelNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Neu Cheese Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Bank of Verdigre and Trust Company, a Nebraska Banking Corporation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Bank of Verdigre and Trust Company, a Nebraska Banking Corporation v. Neu Cheese CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API