Legal Opinion

Battle Creek State Bank v. Haake

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1998No. S-97-713PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

Battle Creek State Bank (BCSB) appeals a jury verdict entered in favor of Ron Haake following the trial of BCSB’s conversion claim and the denial of BCSB’s motion for new trial. BCSB alleged that Haake wrongfully converted certain cash proceeds which BCSB alleged belonged to it. BCSB assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to retroactively apply the 1994 amendments to Neb. U.C.C. § 9-306(2) (Cum. Supp. 1994) and the entry of the jury’s verdict finding that BCSB impliedly waived its right to enforce its security interest in certain cash proceeds. For the reasons recited below, we conclude…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. BurlisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Garden City Production Credit Assn. v. LannanNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. MacKu by and Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Proctor v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & CasualtyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sheldon-Zimbelman v. Bryan Memorial HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fay v. Dowding, Dowding & DowdingNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Thompson v. Kiewit Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Interest of Clifford M.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Farmers Mut. Ins. Co. of Nebraska v. KmentNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API