Legal Opinion

Bilyk v. Chicago Transit Authority

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1988No. 65735PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ward

The Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) brings this direct appeal under Supreme Court Rule 302(a) (107 Ill. 2d R. 302(a)) from a judgment of the circuit court of Cook County which held section 27 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 111 2/3, par. 327) unconstitutional. The section immunizes the CTA from tort liability for any failure to protect passengers from criminal acts of third parties.

The plaintiff, Bogdan Bilyk, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County charging the defendant with negligence and wilful and wanton misconduct. The complaint alleged…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Harris v. Manor Healthcare Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Mega v. Holy Cross HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. BalesIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cutinello v. WhitleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Nevitt v. LangfelderIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Unzicker v. Kraft Food Ingredients Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API