Legal Opinion

Lampitt v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1926No. 1171PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

Albert Lampitt, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree without capital punishment, for causing the death of one Harry Foight. Judgment was rendered on the verdict, confining the defendant in the penitentiary for life, and he brings the case here by proceedings in error.

The main error assigned in the ease is that the verdict and judgment are not sustained by the evidence. It will, accordingly, be necessary to review the testimony. On account of the gravity of the case, we have carefully gone over…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Horn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Keffer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. ChampionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Ex Parte HayesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Durham v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Hebron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Finke v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Sims v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API