Legal Opinion

Hebron v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 22, 1993No. 98, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

At issue in this case is whether the proposition that a conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence cannot stand unless the circumstances are inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence is a proper subject of jury instruction or simply a matter of evidentiary sufficiency. The Court of Special Appeals held that it is the latter. Hebron v. State, 92 Md.App. 508, 608 A.2d 1291, cert. granted, 328 Md. 462, 615 A.2d 262 (1992). We agree.

I

The petitioner, Wayne Hebron, appeals his convictions, entered in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, for breaking…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Winder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API