Legal Opinion

Pope & Fleming v. Graniteville Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1907No. 59PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Breach of contract, from city court of Richmond county — Judge Eve. August 21, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

This case brings for review the judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ petition. We can best make plain the errors complained of u and considered by setting forth with practical completeness the original and amended petition, and also the demurrer. The petition, omitting formal parts, is as follows: “Pope & Fleming, a firm composed of Fred. B. Pope and Porter Fleming, both of said county, bring this action as plaintiffs against the G-raniteville Manufacturing Company as defendant, and show: (1) Said defendant is a corporation existing under the laws of the State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sivell v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Atlanta & LaGrange Railroad v. HodnettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  3. Gray v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Zachry v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Woolbright v. SneedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Harris Waste Management Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. The DARLINGTON CORP. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  3. State Highway Department v. Knox-Rivers Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Wilkerson v. Patton Sash, Door & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API