Wilkerson v. Patton Sash, Door & Building Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on contract; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Reece.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1. Where one party to an alleged contract for “the sale of goods, wares, or merchandise” relies upon a written memorandum, to show compliance with the statute of frauds, the memorandum must show all the terms of the contract, and that both parties thereto assented to those terms. Borum v. Swift, 125 Ga. 202 (53 S. E. 698) ; Clark on Contracts, 83.
2. An acceptance of a written offer relating to a subject-matter within the statute of frauds must itself be in writing, in order to make a con*698tract mutually binding. Pope v. Graniteville Mfg. Co., 1 Ga. App. 176 (57 S. E. 949).
Decided March 6, 1912.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sivell v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Equitable Mortgage Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Borum v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Pope & Fleming v. Graniteville Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- McConnell v. StubbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Hamby v. TruittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Alice v. Robett Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
- Naquin v. Baton Rouge Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Cofer v. WOFFORD OIL CO. OF GEORGIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.