State v. Camp
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BALEY, Judge.
The issue presented by this case is: May the courts take judicial notice of the principles of heredity upon which blood tests for paternity are based? Our answer is yes. The trial court in this case should have taken judicial notice that two parents of blood group 0 cannot have a child of blood group A, and the jury should have been so instructed.
“There are many facts of which the court may take judicial notice, and they should take notice of whatever is, or ought to be, generally known within the limits of their jurisdiction, for justice does not require that courts profess to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Cortese v. CorteseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- State v. . VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Commonwealth v. CoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.