Legal Opinion

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 17, 1987No. Appeal 86-1351PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board), sustaining an opposition to registration of the trademark COMMCASH for “banking services” on the basis of the prior use and registration of the trademark COMMUNICASH for “banking services.” 228 USPQ 689 (TTAB 1986). We affirm.

I

The pertinent facts are as follows:

In May 1981, the appellant Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (Canadian Bank) filed an application to register COMM-CASH as a service mark for “banking services.” Crocker National Bank (Crocker), now Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation's Foodservice, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Cbs Inc. v. George Clifford MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Tom Cunningham v. Laser Golf Corporation (Now Known as Belair Golf)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re: Cordua Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. In Re Dixie Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. v. United States, and Uss-Posco IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Packard Press, Inc.(formerly Packquisition Corporation),appellant v. Hewlett-Packard Company,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API