Legal Opinion

Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided April 13, 1993No. 91-776-CIV-T-17CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AWARD SANCTIONS

KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 107) made pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. Defendants seek summary judgment on all remaining counts in this action, and as to all remaining Defendants. This Order also addresses Defendants’ Motion to Award Sanctions (Docket No. 121) made pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. These two unrelated motions are addressed below, in sequence. R.Civ.P.

I. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A. Summary of Relevant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1993
Sussman v. Salem, Saxon, & Nielsen, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994