Legal Opinion
State v. Russo
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 6, 2001No. AC 19709PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Patsy Russo, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 14-227a (a) (l).1 The defendant’s *131sole claim is that the trial court improperly admitted testimony regarding the results of a horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test without requiring that the state satisfy the criteria for the admission of scientific evidence as set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. DePastinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. HornDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- State v. CiccioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. WestberryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.