Ambuehl v. Matthews
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was brought in the district court for Norman county, and was tried by Mills, J., (a jury being waived,) upon whose decision a judgment of $99.03 was entered for plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The short facts in this case are that, in the fall of 1886, plaintiff and one Reinhardt entered into a verbal contract, by which the latter was to cultivate and crop on shares, “for one or two years,” a farm belonging to the former. Shortly thereafter, and on October 26, 1886, Reinhardt, for valuable consideration and in good faith, executed to plaintiff a chattel mortgage .on his share of the crops of grain to be raised on the farm in the season of A. D. 1887. On the next day he also executed to plaintiff what purported to be a “seed-grain” note for wheat furnished him by plaintiff to be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Herrick v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Colburn v. ColburnMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Bitzer v. BoboSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Sims v. American Steel Barge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Larsen v. Le DouxIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Lieberman v. FoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- National Investment Co. v. SchicklingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.