Legal Opinion

People v. Tidmore

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1963No. Crim. 8693PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.) It was alleged that he entered the residence of Mr. and Mrs. James Hughes with the intent to commit rape. The defendant waived his right to trial by jury. It was stipulated that the cause could be submitted on the transcript of the testimony taken at the preliminary examination, together with such further evidence as either party desired to offer. Further testimony was received. The defendant was found to be guilty of burglary of the first degree. His motion for a new trial was denied. The proceedings were suspended…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. MeichtryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Dixon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. People v. BardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. People v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. State v. ElliottNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API