Berry v. Ketchikan Public Utilities
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Gerald Berry appeals from a decision of the trial court holding that it does not have jurisdiction over Berry’s suit against his employer, Ketchikan Public Utilities (KPU), for “trover and conversion” involving the withholding of Berry’s earnings under a levy by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to recover delinquent income taxes. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the trial court, and grant KPU reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred as a result of this appeal.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Gerald Berry is a self-styled “Freeman” who claims to be immune from any and…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Judy Edgar v. Inland Steel Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Granzow v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Seattle Association of Credit Men, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Mark P. Maxfield v. United States Postal Service, San Francisco Bulk Mail CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- State, Public Employees Retirement Board v. CacioppoAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Foster v. State, Department of TransportationAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Tax Appeal of Rhoads v. OkamuraHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Bowers v. J & M DISCOUNT TOWING, LLC.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2006
- STATE, PUB. EMP. RET. BD. v. CacioppoAlaska Supreme Court · 1991