Legal Opinion

Caudle v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 4, 1993No. 5-93-0071PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maag

This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 307(a)(1) (134 Ill. 2d R. 307(a)(1)) from an order of the circuit court of Wayne County which denied Sears’ motion to compel arbitration and to stay all judicial proceedings pending arbitration. For the reasons set forth below, the circuit court should be reversed.

The relevant facts are as follows: Defendant-appellant, Sears, Roebuck & Co. (hereinafter Sears), decided not to renew separate operating contracts with operators of Sears catalog centers who are from several different States. On September 28, 1992, a class action…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Futures, Inc. v. BarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cigna Healthcare of St. Louis, Inc. v. Timothy N. KaiserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Ervin v. Nokia, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Travis v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Greenwood v. SherfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Robert L. Caudle v. American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API