Greenwood v. Sherfield
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHRUM, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents the question of whether Plaintiffs’ claim against Defendants for tortious interference with contract must be resolved by arbitration. The trial court answered the question negatively and overruled Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. 1 Defendants appeal from that order. We affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiffs operated a Sears catalog store in Mexico, Missouri. They were independent merchants distributing catalog merchandise pursuant to a Sears Authorized Catalog Sales Agreement (the “Merchant Contract”), a contract between Plaintiffs and Sears. Such agreements…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- N&d Fashions, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation and Nelly Don, Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. Dhj Industries, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Downey v. United Weatherproofing, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar CreekSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Whitney v. Alltel Communications, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Reis v. Peabody Coal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Koullas v. RamseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Major v. McCallisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.